AUTUMN 2013 - MARXIST AESTHETIC APPRECIATIONS? - SOLD OUT

T.J. CLARKE: CEZANNE & THE FETISHISM OF COMMODITIES

TRAPPED (PHANTASMATICALLY) WITHIN KLEE AND THE ANGEL OF HISTORY? REVIEW: T.J. CLARKE: HEAVEN ON EARTH

PETRIFIED BY HISTORY (AS ‘THE PAST’)? ALL FUTURES ARE DEAD; OR, THE GUILT COMPLEX OF THE LIVING MARXIST ART HISTORIAN?

THINKING ART AND POLITICS BEYOND LEFT TRAGEDY: DOES CLARKE BID FAREWELL TO THE MODERN AS AN IDEA? OR TO THE NECESSITY TO BE ABSOLUTELY MODERN?

‘MANKIND HAS REACHED SUCH A DEGREE OF SELF-ALIENATION THAT IT CAN EXPERIENCE ITS OWN DESTRUCTION AS AN AESTHETIC PLEASURE OF THE FIRST ORDER. THIS IS THE SITUATION OF POLITICS WHICH FASCISM IS RENDERING AESTHETIC. COMMUNISM RESPONDS BY POLITICIZING ART’

T.J. CLARK’S REACTIONARY DIALECTICAL IMAGE? BOOK REVIEW: HEAVEN ON EARTH

MARXIST ART HISTORIANS MAY MAKE AESTHETIC APPRECIATIONS, I WANT TO MAKE CRITICAL JUDGEMENTS

THOU SHALL NOT CRITICALLY JUDGE! THE SELF-IMAGE OF ART HISTORY; OR, STANDING BACK FROM CRITICAL JUDGEMENT?

THE ART OF MARX

FROM ELEVEN TO FIVE (OR PERHAPS FOUR?): THE NATIONAL GALLERY’S SEDUCTION OF THE INNOCENT? - A ‘PRETENCE’? A ‘CHEAT’? A ‘SNARE’? OR: A TIMELY EFFECT OF A BROADER, MELANCHOLY, FINANCIAL AFFAIR? EXHIBITION REVIEW: ’VERMEER AND MUSIC: THE ART OF LOVE AND LEISURE’

‘DON’T DO IT’ - REVIEW: MANCHESTER INTERNATIONAL FESTIVAL

THE ART PROJECT’S COMMODIFICATION OF STUART HALL, BY ONE OF HIS FORMER COLLABORATORS, EVEN? OR: A PARADOXICAL, BIOGRAPHICAL ‘STRUCTURALIST’ ACCOUNT OF A SINGLE SUBJECT’S FORMATION? REVIEW: THE UNFINISHED CONVERSATION (2012)

ADVERT - ART INAPPROPRIATE TO 100% PURE AESTHETIC EXPERIENCE, EVEN?